In this sense, a person or thing you rely on can be called reliable or reliable. Researchers and doctors have long tried to extract information from someone`s brain — without having to rely on speech, writing, or typing. To say that an outcome depends on something means that it is necessary for the result to occur, as in Our success depends on preparation and a little luck. The sentences depend on it and rest and can be used in the same way. Virtually all surveys suggest that the public holds scientists and science in high regard and believes that science benefits humanity. People also generally believe that scientists are motivated to help humanity. In the same way, it is also important to recognize that not all sciences are equally definitive. Some scientific theories are weaker than others, and some datasets are interpreted more reliably than others. Patients, for example, often ask for a second opinion on their clinical tests or recommendations, because even experts can`t agree on the importance of their results. Such disagreements or uncertainties become particularly problematic when people – scientific or non-scientific – distort or deny the importance of data or results on issues such as vaccine effectiveness or evidence of human-induced climate change, which are better documented. The next synonym for trust in many contexts is dependent. After nineteen hundred years, how can we trust such evidence and such an important and wonderful statement of fact? A person`s confidence in something is their dependence on it. A mime`s dependence on silence is the key to his performance: when he speaks, he is ruined.
Your dependence on stranger kindness makes sense when you consider that you will never run out of strangers you can rely on. Too bad you can`t just rely on the people you know. Instead, the authors had to rely on visual cues and ambiance. Failure to comply with scientific advice results from a general lack of understanding of the nature and processes of science. For example, there is generally some uncertainty in the scientific evidence, and there are very few situations where all scientists agree on what the data shows or how the data should be interpreted. Scientists understand that there may be scientific consensus behind the recommendations they give to the public despite some uncertainty and disagreement – but this can be troubling for non-scientists. Another example is the evolutionary nature of scientific theories. Scientific theories are often revised or even replaced as additional information is obtained. Scientists accept these revisions as a normal part of the scientific process, while the public may view them as a sign of lack of authority or expertise. However, the basic premise is wrong. There is no real evidence that the public has lost faith in science itself. On the contrary, most surveys show that the majority of the public trusts, trusts and respects science and scientists.
Therefore, issues related to expert advice and the public are best viewed as both a societal issue and should be considered in terms of how scientific advances intersect with variables such as individual values, economic and other interests, or politics. The most effective sanitation strategies usually start from this perspective. For languages not in the top 12, the Commission will always try to provide interpreters for public comments, although it may rely on community-based organisations such as PANA to assist with translation. In these instruments, a third of the vocal registers rely on drums to produce their sounds. On the one hand, they are really powerful, and the Democrats rely on their money and work in elections. Many members of science and science policy have recently become increasingly concerned about what they see as a decline in public trust in science. Frequently cited examples include frequent non-adherence to COVID public health guidelines or taking climate change seriously enough to make meaningful changes in individual behavior or support changes in public policy. The discussion then often shifts to debates on how to restore that trust. The ability to retrieve information directly from the brain — without having to speak, write or type — has long been a goal for researchers and doctors looking to help people whose bodies can no longer move or speak. I feel that in this state of affairs, I can confidently count on the generosity and patience of my clients. Public trust in science and scientists is undoubtedly crucial if they are to fulfill their obligations in the service of society, but trust itself does not seem to be a major problem.
Virtually all surveys suggest that the public holds scientists and science in high regard and believes that science benefits humanity. People also generally believe that scientists are motivated to help society.
